windrush children
Immigration

Windrush children: Home Office defames Conservatives, dismays Christians and shames the nation

61-year-old Paulette Wilson (top centre) came to the UK at the age of 10 with her parents. She had sailed all the way from Jamaica aboard HMT Empire Windrush, a passenger ship which gave its name to a generation of immigrants from the British Caribbean. Her family didn’t come to London to beg or scrounge, but to work hard and bring up their family. They endured all the prejudice, intolerance and racism of the age, but Paulette got an education, became a cook, and served food to MPs in the House of Commons. She assumed she was British, and legal. The fact that she made 34 years of National Insurance contributions corroborates this – you’d think. But a few months ago everything changed:

Because she had never applied for a British passport and had no papers proving she had a right to be in the UK, she was classified as an illegal immigrant. Last October, she was sent to the immigration removal centre at Yarl’s Wood in Bedford for a week, and then taken to Heathrow before deportation to Jamaica, a country she had not visited for 50 years and where she has no surviving relatives.

Anthony Bryan has lived in the UK for 50 years, but got carted off to a detention centre: “Last November, police and immigration officials arrived early on a Sunday morning at his home with a battering ram; a plane ticket was booked to take him to Jamaica, the country he left when he was eight and to which he has not returned in the past 52 years.”

Renford McIntyre has worked in the UK and paid taxes for 48 years, “but in 2014 a request for updated paperwork from his employers revealed he did not have documents showing he had a right to be in the UK. He was sacked; the local council told him he was not eligible for housing support or any benefits, so he became homeless”.

Michael Braithwaite, 66 years old, came from Barbados at the age of nine: “He was asked to submit documentary proof that he had the right to live in the UK. He had never applied for a passport and was unable to prove he was here legitimately. He was devastated to lose his job.”

There are many more such stories – some of them utterly heartbreaking – of families being torn apart by Home Office officialdom: children being deprived of their parents; grandchildren of their grandparents. There’s bankruptcy, homelessness, destitution and despair, all triggered by letters from the Home Office informing the children of Windrush: “You have NOT been given leave to enter the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Immigration Act 1971”, and so you must either leave voluntarily, or we’ll do it forcibly.

What an unutterable disgrace this is from a Conservative Immigration Minister (who professes to be ‘respectful’ of Christian beliefs) who works for a Conservative Home Secretary under the authority of a Conservative (and Christian) Prime Minister, who exhorts the values of love, service and compassion.

And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him.
But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God (Lev 19:33f).

The treatment of the Windrush children isn’t a left-right issue; it isn’t a black/white issue or a Christian/non-Christian issue. It is actually uniting Socialist and Tory bishops, the Guardian and the Daily Mail, and MPs across the parties. Indeed, the plight of the Windrush children isn’t an issue that ought to cause any division at all, because it is one of natural justice, human compassion and political common sense. What did the Home Office think would happen here? That nobody would care? That bishops wouldn’t demand an amnesty or tweet their dismay? Or that a people’s petition wouldn’t attract more than a few-hundred supporters? What is the point of boasting about our good works overseas when we’re harassing and persecuting our own? Or at least those who think they’re our own.

Or thought they were our own.

The children of Windrush hail from the British Caribbean in the Commonwealth of Nations. They share our values and respect our traditions, because so many of them are also theirs. They have lived and worked here for decades; they have raised their families here, and forged their friendships here. They are not illegal immigrants, but naturalised Britons. They have never called anywhere else ‘home’ – not Jamaica, Barbados or Antigua; not anywhere but Birmingham, Brixton and Toxteth. They should not be detained or deported, but respected and honoured for the faithfulness and endurance. Windrush children are as British as the Immigration Minister and the Home Secretary: this is their shared identity. One might expect a Christian Prime Minister to understand this. Their treatment shames the nation.